The excerpts from “Humble Leadership” introduce a paradigm shift in the understanding of leadership, moving away from focusing solely on heroic figures and prescribed traits towards an emphasis on the practice of Humble Leadership. The core concept is Situational Humility, defined as the openness to see and understand all elements of a situation by accepting uncertainty, being open to others’ knowledge, and recognizing biases. This practice is fundamentally linked to the development and maintenance of different Levels of Relationship, ranging from negative (Level -1) to intimate (Level 3), with Level 2 (Whole-person relationships) being crucial for effective collaboration and organizational success in dynamic environments. The document explores how Humble Leadership, rooted in situational humility and fostered through Level 2 relationships, manifests in creating, transforming, and managing organizations, even in traditionally hierarchical settings. It also touches upon the influence of culture (artifacts, espoused values, and underlying assumptions) and the importance of adapting leadership practices to a rapidly changing future driven by technology and evolving social dynamics. Practical exercises for building relationships and understanding group decision-making are also presented.
Main Themes and Key Ideas:
- Humble Leadership as a Foundational Practice:
- The book argues that traditional leadership literature often focuses on lists of skills, formulas, and attributes of heroic leaders. However, “Humble Leadership emphasizes the practice of how any of these traits can help drive new and better actions.”
- Humble Leadership is presented not as a distinct style, but as a fundamental process that can complement and enhance various existing leadership concepts like servant leadership, adaptive leadership, or transformative leadership. “Whether a person is a ‘servant leader,’ a ‘real’ or an ‘adaptive’ or an ‘inclusive’ leader, or even a ‘charismatic’ or ‘iconoclastic’ leader, the practice of Humble Leadership can help reinforce those ideal traits and move that leader forward toward desired goals.”
- Situational Humility as the Core of Humble Leadership:
- A specific sense of humility, termed “Situational Humility,” is central to Humble Leadership. It is a developed skill characterized by:
- Accepting uncertainty and remaining curious.
- Being intentionally and mindfully open to what others know.
- Recognizing unconscious biases.
- This involves actively acknowledging “that you do not know everything you need to know,” which is vital for discovering new insights and enabling others to share their knowledge.
- The Importance of Relationships and “Levels of Relationship”:
- A Relationship is defined as “a set of mutual expectations between people, in which future behavior is based on past interactions.” “We have a relationship when we can anticipate the other’s behavior to some degree.”
- A “good relationship” involves confidence in anticipating behavior and a shared goal, reflecting interpersonal trust.
- The authors introduce a framework of Levels of Relationship to move beyond simple “good” or “bad” distinctions. These levels are culturally prescribed and influence trust and openness.
- Level Minus 1 (Negative Relationships): Characterized by antipathy and can be constructive in bounded, developmental contexts like military training or rigorous academic programs, where a shared understanding of the unequal power exists as part of a process.
- Level 1 (Transactional Relationships): Characterized by apathy and self-interest. Trust and openness are limited, and information may be withheld if it doesn’t benefit the other party (e.g., “buyer beware” in sales). “At Level 1, apathy means indifference to the well-being of the other side.” This level is problematic in work contexts where collaboration is needed.
- Level 2 (Whole-person Relationships): Built on trust and “personization,” where there is an interest in the whole person beyond their role. Characterized by empathy and a willingness to put aside self-interest to find mutual or collective interest. “At Level 2, empathy for the well-being of the other person is central to the process of per-sonization.” This level is crucial for collaboration and information sharing.
- Level 2.5: Lies between Level 2 and Level 3, incorporating some degree of compassion and intense commitment.
- Level 3 (Intimate Relationships): Emotionally charged, characterized by compassion, care, and actively seeking to help and enhance each other.
- Building relationships, particularly towards Level 2, is a process of mutual discovery through “small experiments in openness.”
- Humble Leadership in Practice: Examples and Applications:
- Humble Leadership, even by formally appointed leaders who might not seem “humble” in the traditional sense, is demonstrated through situational humility and building appropriate relationships.
- Co-creating Singapore: Lee Kwan Yew and colleagues, despite a strict hierarchy, fostered Level 2 relationships within the government, enabling open communication and trust. They demonstrated situational humility by seeking expert advice from the UN and foreign advisors, and learning from successful companies like Royal Dutch Shell. “Lee and his colleagues were exemplars of situational hu-mility, and they explicitly articulated a philosophy of prag-matically learning from others what would work best for Singapore.”
- Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC): Ken Olsen built DEC on Level 2 relationships, encouraging openness and debate among engineers. He exemplified situational humility by acknowledging his own limitations and trusting his experts. However, the failure to adapt to organizational divisions led to a deterioration of Level 2 relationships and economic decline, highlighting that “if you em-power people and grow at the same time, they may develop their own power base and begin to act competitively.”
- Transforming a Public Utility (“Alpha Company”): The transformation involved the CEO and board chair recognizing the need for a stronger knowledge base and building Level 2 relationships with local management and unions. “Alpha’s new chair of the board, Joan Willis…felt that Alpha had to not only mend fences with local government but also transform its image…to a socially responsible member of the community.” This involved creating a dedicated environmental health and safety (EH&S) committee and seeking outside expertise.
- Military Context: While seemingly contradictory to hierarchy, Humble Leadership can be present. Captain Marquet on a US Navy submarine fostered a culture of initiative and personization by changing communication patterns and greeting sailors by name, regardless of rank. An admiral demonstrated situational humility by engaging in direct dialogue with a junior sailor after an error, focusing on process improvement over blame. This illustrated that “the hierarchy is a socio-technical system.”
- Culture and Humble Leadership:
- Organizational culture is structured in three layers: Artifacts (visible, tangible elements), Espoused Values (stated beliefs and aspirations), and Underlying Assumptions (core, non-negotiable beliefs).
- Leadership, visualized as a “wave,” aims to create change by navigating the existing cultural forces (represented as “wind” and “water”).
- Understanding and influencing culture is crucial for effective Humble Leadership.
- The Future of Humble Leadership:
- The future will bring increasing complexity, driven by technological advancements (e.g., AI, digital natives) and evolving social trends (“meta culture”).
- “Sharpening our situational humility” is necessary to perceive emerging cultural trends.
- The ability to assimilate information and adapt will become even more critical, favoring those open to learning and collaboration.
- An “individualistic, competitive, destiny-is-in-my-hands-alone mindset” will be limiting. The most effective leadership will operate within a “we together” cooperation framework.
- Continually “testing goal consensus” within groups and across cultural boundaries will be essential in a globally connected world.
Key Facts and Concepts Introduced:
- Situational Humility: A core concept and developed skill involving openness to uncertainty, openness to others’ knowledge, and recognizing biases.
- Relationships: Defined by mutual expectations and based on past interactions, leading to interpersonal trust.
- Levels of Relationship: A framework for categorizing the nature of relationships (Level -1, 1, 2, 2.5, 3), with Level 2 being particularly important for collaborative work.
- Personization: The process of engaging with others as whole people beyond their roles, central to building Level 2 relationships.
- Culture: A three-layer structure of artifacts, espoused values, and underlying assumptions that influence organizational behavior and leadership.
- Culture Scenario Planning/Meta Culture: The process of anticipating future cultural trends and their impact.
- “We together” Mindset: The idea that effective future leadership will prioritize collaboration over individual heroism.
- Relationship Mapping: A tool for visualizing and analyzing current work relationships and planning for future relationship development.
- Consensus Testing: A group decision-making process aiming for everyone to agree to support and implement a decision, even if they personally disagree.
Important Quotes:
- “Consider Humble Leadership as a fundamental process that underlies and can complement various notions of leadership described as “servant leadership” or as “adap-tive,” “boundary-spanning,” “learning,” “inclusive,” “trans-actional,” “transformative,” and so on.”
- “A very specific sense of the word humility is at the core of Humble Leadership. Situational humility is a developed skill characterized by the openness to see and understand all the elements of a situation…”
- “Rather than approaching a situation girded with only the data you are already comfortable with, it is important to embrace the fact that you do not know everything you need to know…”
- “A relationship is a set of mutual expectations between peo-ple, in which future behavior is based on past interactions.”
- “At Level 1, apathy means indifference to the well-being of the other side.”
- “At Level 2, empathy for the well-being of the other person is central to the process of per-sonization.”
- “Even if a situation doesn’t require Level 3 intimacy, we should here recognize a Level 2.5, which goes beyond Level 2’s openness and trust and includes some degree of Level 3’s compassion and intense commitment.”
- “At Level Minus 1, antipathy means that the dominant party may actively seek to harm the dominated party…At Level 1, apathy means indifference…At Level 2, empathy…At Level 3, compassion…”
- “Lee and his colleagues were exemplars of situational hu-mility, and they explicitly articulated a philosophy of prag-matically learning from others what would work best for Singapore. They knew what they did not know, and they were not afraid to ask for help.”
- “At the same time, the story illustrates that if you em-power people and grow at the same time, they may develop their own power base and begin to act competitively when they realize they are no longer “just smart” but also lead-ers of their own mini-organizations, which they then might prioritize over the common goal.”
- “Alpha’s new chair of the board, Joan Willis…felt that Alpha had to not only mend fences with local government but also transform its image…to a socially responsible member of the community.”
- “The change program began with Willis and the CEO rec-ognizing that they needed a much more powerful knowl-edge base, particularly around the environmental issues.”
- “Let us look at another change Marquet implemented, this one related to creating personized relationships among his crew. His goal was to instill pride in his sailors, and one way of doing that was to acknowledge them as people, not roles.”
- “At Level Minus 1, antipathy means that the dominant party may actively seek to harm the dominated party in order to reinforce the unequal relationship. At Level 1, apathy means indifference to the well-being of the other side…At Level 2, empathy for the well-being of the other person is central…And at Level 3, compassion…”
- “Let us start by looking at the first two terms and how they relate to each other. A company’s buildings…comprise the artifacts of any given culture. They are the things you can physi-cally see, hear, and feel in the workplace. What insiders say about their company represents the espoused values…”
- “Culture scenario planning may sound like a difficult process: it is, in essence, trying to predict something vague and elusive. We can only offer science fiction writer William Gibson’s implied words of encouragement: “The future is already here—it’s just not evenly distributed”…”
- “In group dynamics and meeting management training, this is described as “frequently testing goal consensus.” It must become an important Level 2 process in any work-group for someone to inquire, “Let’s check on whether we are all on the same page: what are we trying to do?””
- “An individualistic, competitive, destiny-is-in-my-hands-alone mindset limits a leader’s ability to handle uncertainty and volatility…”
- “When everyone has agreed that they could support and implement the decision even if they personally continue to disagree, then consensus has been reached. There is no return to voting.”
- “One important thing to note: It may be tempting to in-clude circles for functions, divisions, or roles that you in-teract with…the pri-mary intent of this exercise is to focus on the relationships with particular people. This work is about people, not their roles…”
- “Level 2 Whole-person relationships: built on trust and personization, as seen in friendships and in effec-tive, collaborative teams”
- “Try to become mindful of unconscious biases within you toward the other person.”
- “Acknowledge your ignorance; you may actually know nothing about the other person.”
- “Mobilize your curiosity about that person.”
- “I am curious about you.”
- “I want to know your story.”
- “I want to get to know you as a whole person as quickly as possible.”
- “I want to be able to “see” you, that is, to understand you and develop empathy for your situation.”
- “I do not want to judge you.”
- “I do not want to diagnose you or figure you out.”
- “I do not want to test you.”
- “Most of us already know how to personize in our social and personal activities. You have the skills, but because you may never have consciously used them in the work setting, you may have to spend some time thinking about what they are, practicing them, and honing them for this new goal that you have set for yourself.”
Conclusion:
These excerpts from “Humble Leadership” provide a compelling argument for shifting the focus of leadership development towards the cultivation of situational humility and the intentional building of strong, collaborative relationships. The framework of Levels of Relationship offers a practical lens for understanding and improving interpersonal dynamics within organizations. The examples provided illustrate how Humble Leadership is not confined to specific personalities or contexts but is a vital practice for navigating complexity, fostering innovation, and achieving sustainable success in the face of evolving challenges. The emphasis on understanding and adapting to cultural dynamics, along with the recognition of the increasing need for a “we together” mindset in the future, highlights the forward-looking nature of this approach to leadership.
RYT Podcast is a passion product of Tyler Smith, an EOS® Implementer (more at IssueSolving.com). All Podcasts are derivative works created by AI from publicly available sources. Copyright 2025 All Rights Reserved.